منابع مشابه
Maximal Crossed Product Orders over Discrete Valuation Rings
The problem of determining when a (classical) crossed product T = S ∗ G of a finite group G over a discrete valuation ring S is a maximal order, was answered in the 1960’s for the case where S is tamely ramified over the subring of invariants S. The answer was given in terms of the conductor subgroup (with respect to f) of the inertia. In this paper we solve this problem in general when S/S is ...
متن کاملDouble-crossed chords and distance-hereditary graphs
An early characterization of distance-hereditary graphs is that every cycle of length 5 or more has crossing chords. A new, stronger, property is that in every cycle of length 5 or more, some chord has at least two crossing chords. This new property can be characterized by every block being complete multipartite, and also by the vertex sets of cycles of length 5 or more always inducing 3-connec...
متن کاملOn Crossed Product of Algebras
The concept of a crossed tensor product of algebras is studied from a few points of views. Some related constructions are considered. Crossed enveloping algebras and their representations are discussed. Applications to the noncommutative geometry and particle systems with generalized statistics are indicated. PACS. 02. 40. +m Differential geometry in theoretical physics. PACS. 03. 65. Fd Algebr...
متن کاملPartial Crossed Product of a group G vs Crossed Product of S ( G )
In this work we present a new definition to the Partial Crossed Product by actions of inverse semigroups in a C-algebra, without using the covariant representations as Sieben did in [5]. Also we present an isomorphism between the partial crossed products by partial actions of a group G and the partial crossed product by actions of S(G), an inverse semigroup associated to G introduced by Exel in...
متن کاملA Formula for the Direct Product of Crossed Product Algebras
tive radius r. Let the center Xo be the sequence {&?}, and let 5 be chosen so large that 2~~ + 2~ s 2 + • • • k Q s. If we define xi as (ki, &2> ' * • » $j j8+i, is+2, • • • ), then xi belongs to K and limn fn(xi) = + °°Consequently xi cannot be a point of Up and this contradiction establishes U as a set of the f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Pacific Journal of Mathematics
سال: 1986
ISSN: 0030-8730,0030-8730
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1986.122.333